PokerStars homepage
  • If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is soft play cheating your views

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Is soft play cheating your views

    Just wondered what players think of soft play and should it carry a ban.

    Blinds were 200 - 400 I was small blind in seat 9 mid sized stack
    big blind in seat 1 low stack
    seat 2 calls the BB big stack
    I call the BB
    BB checks.
    Flop comes BB bets 400
    seat 2 calls
    I fold
    BB checks
    seat 2 folds.
    Both players from are from the same area.

    I emailed support to get it checked out they confirmed a relationship and found that they did go easy on one another and will not be allowed at the same table again.

  • #2
    I am a psychic and can predict the reply you will receive...


    PokerStars continually monitors the games for collusion, and we sincerely appreciate you bringing your concerns to our attention. Following your report, we have completed an investigation into the accounts of players 'ImnewandIcheat' and 'Myotheraccount'.

    One of the most important aspects of a case we consider when reviewing a case for collusion is whether or not the suspect players have a relationship. Key in trying to determine the nature of a relationship, if any, is location. In this case, both players live in a hutl, but more than 3 feet apart. Location, however, is generally not a good indicator as to whether cooperative play is occurring or not. It is noteworthy, but in and of itself is not sufficient.

    Aside from location, we use a variety of tools and methods to assist us in determining whether or not relationships exist between players. One of the things we look at is their frequency of play together. Given how many players are playing on PokerStars at any given time, it would be unusual for seemingly unrelated players to frequently end up at the same table. The players in this case have only played hands together in this tournament. This fact, along with the other data we considered, confirm that these players do not seem to have a relationship with one another besides sexual.

    No collusion review could be complete, though, without a thorough review of the play itself. An advantage of online poker, as compared to live poker, is that every hand is recorded, allowing for a complete review. If any play is considered suspicious we can review the hands with all cards showing.

    When reviewing tournament play for possible collusion we check for the following:

    1) Best hand playing - where colluding players play only the better of their two hands.

    2) Soft playing - where colluding players refuse to play aggressively against each other. For example they may check or fold against each other where they would normally bet or raise against a stranger.

    3) Chip dumping/Stack balancing - where the large stack folds to the small stack to balance their chips. The idea is to improve the chances of both players finishing in money positions in a tournament.

    We found no evidence of any of this suspicious play.


    Sincerly,

    HeadstuckintheSand

    Please remember that we are having a promotion that entitles you to a free Ace Ace cracking when you
    reload your account.

    Comment


    • #3
      Softplay is almost impossible to catch because stars gives these players so many benefits of the doubt.

      -- They are new they didnt know
      I guess signing the TOS is not good enough.Mind you it is suprising to see how many players unable to speak a lick of English can get through the sign up and on to the tables.

      - it wont happen again
      I love this one it implies we all get a free kick at cheating till caught and then have to revert to honest play.

      They will note the account and you will never know if they where finally slapped on the wrist.

      So with the stance they take the only thing you can do is watch for it and think of spots you can exploit it or stay out of the way of.

      Comment


      • #4
        This is the reply I got but I do consider myself well told off for it.

        Hello ******

        Again, thank you very much for your report. Our review of '***********' and '**********' is now complete. We confirmed a relationship and found that they did go easy on one another (known as soft play) on occasion. This is a violation of our tournament rule #20 as posted at:

        http://www.pokerstars.com/tournamentsrules.html

        We have the advantage of being able to replay the games with all cards exposed. We carefully reviewed all events in which at least one of the two finished in the money. As a result of our findings, players who were likely harmed by the unfair play have been advanced and have received credits consistent with their new finish position. Because we found reason to believe that they were not aware of the seriousness of the unfair play, the cost to advance these players has been paid by PokerStars. You finished 4th in T#********* behind '***********'. As such we have advanced you into 3rd and I have credited your account with $**** to reflect your new finish.

        It is not uncommon to find that players are not aware of the seriousness of such action in tournament play. The overall review, which included requests for explanations from the players and consideration of all account information, led us to conclude that their action was not malicious. Therefore they will be allowed to continue playing on the site. That said, we did take action to see that they do not play in the same Sit & Go Tournaments in the future, or at the same cash game table for that matter.

        During the review, I notice you mentioned your suspicions about their play in open chat. There are many reasons that we ask you not to do this, including:

        1) You may be accusing two perfectly innocent people of being dishonest. If they are innocent, then you have unfairly sullied their reputations amongst other players at the table.

        2) It can negatively impact any collusion investigation. If they are guilty, you have just alerted them to your suspicions, and they will immediately modify their behaviour to avoid detection.

        Please understand that accusing a player of cheating at a poker table is extremely serious and should never be done publicly. As poker is a game of incomplete information, it is difficult to judge with certainty what cards players are holding, let alone if they are attempting to collude with others. In future, please simply email us at support@pokerstars.com with your concerns and we will conduct an investigation similar to this one.

        The integrity of our games is of utmost importance as is fair resolution of situations such as this. Our primary concern is to assure our players of a fair and secure environment in which to enjoy online poker. Your vigilance in noticing the situation and reporting your concerns are appreciated. Please don't hesitate to let us know anytime you have questions or concerns.

        Regards,


        PokerStars Game Security Team

        Comment


        • #5
          did you or pokerstars take the names out ??


          sometimes i laugh so hard tears run down my leg

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Weeharry777 View Post
            Just wondered what players think of soft play and should it carry a ban.

            Blinds were 200 - 400 I was small blind in seat 9 mid sized stack
            big blind in seat 1 low stack
            seat 2 calls the BB big stack
            I call the BB
            BB checks.
            Flop comes BB bets 400
            seat 2 calls
            I fold
            BB checks
            seat 2 folds.
            Both players from are from the same area.

            I emailed support to get it checked out they confirmed a relationship and found that they did go easy on one another and will not be allowed at the same table again.
            i note ps has done something here
            well done ps
            I am always ready to learn although I do not always like being taught. ~Winston Churchill

            13 Time Bracelet Winner


            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by hemetdennis View Post
              did you or pokerstars take the names out ??


              I used real names.


              @ Weeharry777,Im pretty jealous that you actually got some where.
              Nice to read that for a change.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Deleted user View Post
                I used real names.


                @ Weeharry777,Im pretty jealous that you actually got some where.
                Nice to read that for a change.
                i don't know what you mean
                i was speaking to weeharry777


                sometimes i laugh so hard tears run down my leg

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by hemetdennis View Post
                  i don't know what you mean
                  i was speaking to weeharry777


                  someone quick .. frame this post
                  May the tinfoil protect you. MT

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by hemetdennis View Post
                    did you or pokerstars take the names out ??


                    This one too!!
                    May the tinfoil protect you. MT

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by mtnestegg View Post
                      someone quick .. frame this post
                      Originally posted by mtnestegg View Post
                      This one too!!
                      Yes, I've been curious for a few days now as to who persuaded the SCREAMER to pipe down and exactly how they did it.

                      Haven't bothered asking because I doubt the true reason would ever be REVEALED.



                      PS. Apologies to the op for the wee hijack.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Nice work Harry. umbup: Players should always remain vigilant, but as you see, don't call them out on the table, report it to support.
                        Originally posted by Deleted user View Post
                        ....@ Weeharry777,Im pretty jealous that you actually got some where. Nice to read that for a change.
                        I know it's a sore spot, but I've had 2 separate occasions where the suspicions, and conclusions, were the same as in this instance, but the results were even stronger. One unfortunately was a PSO game, and the other at a cash table. Both occasions had all 4 players banned from Pokerstars. They informed me of it in email, and they were not to be found again. It does not help anyone to discourage others from reporting suspicions to support. If players weren't concerned that other players were willing to report them for such things, imagine how much more you would see of it. As you see, not everyone is satisfied with the outcome of every investigation, but they do work. Stay positive, stay vigilant, have fun.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I took the names out as I did not want to turn the post into a slagging off players.I just wanted other players views on should rule 20 carry a more serious penalty than a mere slap on the wrist.
                          I am in no doubt the 2 players knew what they were doing and I feel that it is a form of cheating and I think any players doing this should face a ban as a deterrent and to help eradicate this kind of play from pokerstars.


                          OOOPs sorry Dan did not notice your post their just to say thanks.
                          Last edited by Weeharry777; Wed Nov 09, 2011, 06:19 PM.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            It is likely that the players I dealt with had a prior history of being warned, and didn't heed the warnings, resulting in a ban from my inquisition. Your players evidently don't have that kind of a history from what we read in the email you received back. But if they do it repeatedly, and it gets reported, they will face the same fate.

                            No prob. ..just posted this while you edited.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I suppose I should preface this by defining the term "soft play." If you mean a situation where one player has gone all-in, several players have called the all-in, and these players then check to the showdown, that kind of soft play I find allowable under one condition. That condition being no overt decision by those involved not to bid further. It is a valid strategy for eliminating a player since the more players in a hand, the better the chances of eliminating the player who is committed.

                              However, I also find it ill mannered of the other players to insult the player who then raises, or bets on a subsequent street. Have seen that happen too. Each person has to play their hand the way that will be best for them.

                              If your definition means that two or more players check through to the showdown, regardless of their hand strength, then I see that as a form of collusion. It would take me a few hands to establish such a relationship, but once I'm certain, I would record the pertinent hand histories and contact support. One has to be certain the reason is soft play, and not an overly timid player, or one that misjudges his hand strength.

                              Such an accusation is serious. I wouldn't voice such a suspision on the table via chat since it might alert the players. Best to notify support and let them do the investigation.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X

                              X Cookies Information

                              We have placed cookies on your computer to improve your experience on our website. You can change your cookie settings at any time. Otherwise, we'll assume you're OK to continue.