PokerStars homepage
  • If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Antigua - our last, best hope!!

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Antigua - our last, best hope!!

    The nation of Antigua, which is home to Absolute Poker, one of the three sites shutdown by the Feds and the only one that has yet to work out an agreement with the U.S. government to allow its U.S. players to cashout their accounts, is threatening to sue the U.S. government because they say its crackdown on poker players is illegal!!

    Apparently the tiny Caribbean nation has kicked our butts once before when the government tried to shutdown its gambling businesses. According to the article, the World Trade Organization "ruled in 2005 that the United States violated international agreements on trade in services by prosecuting the operators of offshore Internet gambling sites. The WTO rejected the U.S. argument that the restrictions were necessary to protect public morality."

    This sounds suspiciously like what the Feds are doing again. Interestingly, the WTO allowed Antigua to retaliate in 2007 by suspending the amount of money it was losing from U.S. companies doing business in Antigua.

    http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/...News&ca=rssvzw

    Go, Antigua, go!!!

  • #2
    Fascinating! Thanks for posting that teepack.

    The WTO unfair trade angle adds an interesting wrinkle. That's true that gambling is legal in the US at brick and mortar establishments, and there's been speculation that some politicians have been opposing online gambling because it poses a threat to brick and mortar casinos.

    On the other hand, by most accounts, there were some politicians who actually opposed online gaming because of the morality issue, and the legislators of sovereign nations ought to have the right to pass into law rules that they believe are reflective of the will of their citizenry.

    It feels like Absolute Poker has a stronger case than the other two because of the WTO ruling, and the vocal support of the Antiguan government. But there's still all those unknowns ... it'll be interesting to watch and see how this unfolds. If it reaches court, and goes before a jury then either poker will be declared legal or the people from Absolute Poker who are being charged could possibly be fined and go to jail. I wonder if that's where they're wanting this to go or whether they're just negotiating at a different pace from the other two ...

    Interesting ...

    Comment


    • #3
      a bill created by deceit and trickery is somehow the law?

      everyone who say's yes to protect are port's say aye we have 317 Aye's

      Barney frank asks what is this illegal online poker inside a safe port act in here he tells other about the trick to make online poker illegal inside a name like safe port act in the bill 93 Nay's not Quick enough to expose the truth

      Comment


      • #4
        [QUOTE=protect public morality."[/QUOTE]


        yea and the morality is to stop players who have pictures of cat's dogs and there family as avatars to stop i have yet to see some posting his pic as a drunkn booze hound a scraggly beard and un shampooed hair

        Comment


        • #5
          Go Baby Go

          GO Antigua, How do I donate a $1.00 to their Presidental election fund!!

          Comment


          • #6
            bramuda bahama come on pretty momma, antigua, jamaca ohhh I wanna take ya, down to kokomo, we'll get there fast and then take it slow, that's where I wanna go

            beach boys, everyone sing along....sorry I got a bit carried away but I love that song....seriously

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by TrustySam View Post

              <SNIPPED FOR BREVITY>.

              On the other hand, by most accounts, there were some politicians who actually opposed online gaming because of the morality issue, and the legislators of sovereign nations ought to have the right to pass into law rules that they believe are reflective of the will of their citizenry.

              <SNIPPED>

              Interesting ...
              Morality?

              Strip clubs and Pink clubs abound, frequented by married men and women who left their kids under the temporary care of the baby sitter who probably, while they are out, invited some friends over and have some "drink."

              Adult theater who are frequented by married pervs.

              Las Vegas, the haven for all types and sort of gambling. How is this different from online casinos and poker rooms? Well of course aside from being located inside the US and being levied tax...

              Pseudo-moralists I should say.

              Let the adult population decide! If they do anything illegal in the course of fulfulling their vice/habit, then prosecute them. Heck, get the national guard and put them to firing squad.

              Comment


              • #8
                George W Bush gave concessions in 2007 to Antigua and the European union in 2007 to settle the WTO decision at that time. They declined to say what they were under the umbrella of 'national security'. It is estimated that he gave a way BILLIONS.

                All to protect the country from online poker.

                You can look this in Wikipedia under 'Safe Port Act' or UIGEA.

                Does ANYONE not feel disgusted by the Republicans and George W Bush?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Yes, I understand lastcard. I understand that people who lie and cheat and steal justify themselves by saying that 'everyone else' does it. You didn't even join the PS until this month. So why are you posting? What do you care? Probably an FBI weasel. I'll be sure and make a note about this ID lastcard1. ADMITS TO HAVING MORE THAN ONE ACCOUNT AND COLLUDING WITH OTHERS. That about right?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by lastcard1
                    Most of the online poker groupies just dont want to believe it but it's deff over and will only get worse before it gets better. Hope they dont hold their breath for to long tho. iv came ahead all in all on the site but waisted many many hours, i hope they always make online poker illigal it is shady iv had multiple accounts for years and cornered tables with others its a small part of the bigger schemes but PS really dont care as long as they can get that RAKE!! For every person that petitions the gov to keep it there will be another inline against it. LONG LIVED ONLINE POKER!!! and the pros that endorse it are sellouts:wave

                    The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he who, in the name of charity and good will, shepherds the weak through the valley of the darkness, for he is truly his brother's keeper and the finder of lost children. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy My brothers. And you will know I am the Lord when I lay My vengeance upon you."

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by teepack View Post
                      . The WTO rejected the U.S. argument that the restrictions were necessary to protect public morality."
                      Public morality! That is just so American! That is part of the image problem that America has (largely it's government), it thinks it is better than everyone and therefore dictate stuff like morality.

                      Go Antigua, GO!!!
                      'Cause I have done it before and I can do it some more I got my eye on the score'

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Scintle View Post
                        George W Bush gave concessions in 2007 to Antigua and the European union in 2007 to settle the WTO decision at that time. They declined to say what they were under the umbrella of 'national security'. It is estimated that he gave a way BILLIONS.

                        All to protect the country from online poker.

                        You can look this in Wikipedia under 'Safe Port Act' or UIGEA.

                        Does ANYONE not feel disgusted by the Republicans and George W Bush?
                        If you will check into this a little you will discover that this is not the first time the USA or other nations have chosen to make concessions in other areas as compensation when found at fault by the WTO.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Yes, our attitude is, 'We know what's best for you, and if you won't protect yourselves from these problems, we'll just do it for you. Even if it means we have to eventually pay you billions of dollars as a settlement because what we did was against the law. We still know what is best for you.'

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X

                          X Cookies Information

                          We have placed cookies on your computer to improve your experience on our website. You can change your cookie settings at any time. Otherwise, we'll assume you're OK to continue.