PokerStars homepage
  • If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

$1 180 hand for analysis

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • $1 180 hand for analysis

    Would like to know how i played this.
    http://www.boomplayer.com/en/poker-h...601_67CA76FFB3

  • #2
    Hi 3wadefan,

    You Played it fine I think but in reality that depends on your reads of the villian.

    some questions

    1. is 3x your standard open with a limper in the pot?

    2. when vilian called check raise on the flop what did you put him on?

    3. did you consisder shoving the flop?

    4. with the flush getting there on the river did you consider just calling the 80 chips?

    5. what range did you think the viliian had and how did that change throughout the hand


    Grade b
    I am always ready to learn although I do not always like being taught. ~Winston Churchill

    13 Time Bracelet Winner


    Comment


    • #3
      The villian was playing 50% of pots, any time he had AQ+ JJ+ so far no matter what action if any pre flop he just shoved
      1. No i would usually 4x that, i dont know why i did that there.
      2. I had him on any pair.
      3. i considered, but i figured from what a saw of the villian, that he would call 3 streets of betting more then a shove.
      4. I did consider calling, but i really just didnt believe he had the flush. i think he would of played it diffrently one turn if he was drawing for a flush.
      5. i had him on up to A10, or up to KJ
      Last edited by 3WadeFan; Fri Nov 22, 2013, 06:37 PM.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by 3WadeFan View Post
        The villian was playing 50% of pots, any im he had AQ+ JJ+ so far no matter what action if any pre flop he just shoved
        1. No i would usually 4x that, i dont know why i did that there.
        2. I had him on any pair.
        3. i considered, but i figured from what a saw of the villian, that he would call 3 streets of betting more then a shove.
        4. I did consider calling, but i really just didnt believe he had the flush. i think he would of played it diffrently one turn if he was drawing for a flush.
        5. i had him on up to A10, or up to KJ

        so based on your reads you played in fine.

        personally for me I think the dimond may have slowed me down but without knowing the table dymanic its hard to say.
        I am always ready to learn although I do not always like being taught. ~Winston Churchill

        13 Time Bracelet Winner


        Comment


        • #5
          Hi 3WadeFan! With AA and a limper in front of me, I'm going to make a standard raise to 3BB+1BB for each limper. With this being the case, I'll raise to 80. I want to keep all of my bets standard, so that the opps are continually guessing as to the cards that I have. Players that bet more or less based on their cards are basically turning their cards face-up to an observant opponent... something that I want to avoid. I see a HU flop IN position that brings three unders. The opp now leads into me for an abnormally small bet of 40. A standard bet with one opp is 1/2 pot, so since they bet small, I need to raise by 1/2 pot in order to price out any draws that the opp may have. Due to this, I will raise to 135. The turn is another under and I need to do the same thing when the opp makes another abnormally small bet. I will once again raise by 1/2 pot, so I will raise to 325... BUT... this bet will basically pot-commit me, as I will be putting in 1/3 of my remaining chips. Due to this, I'm shoving the turn. I need to keep all of my bets standard and make them large enough that I price out any possible draws. When I bet too small, if I give the opp a +EV draw to beat me.. it's my own fault that I lose the hand. Hope this helps and good luck at the tables.umbup: John (JWK24)
          Super-Moderator



          6 Time Bracelet Winner


          Comment

          Working...
          X

          X Cookies Information

          We have placed cookies on your computer to improve your experience on our website. You can change your cookie settings at any time. Otherwise, we'll assume you're OK to continue.