PokerStars homepage
  • If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Recreational numbers vs Pro or grinder numbers

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Recreational numbers vs Pro or grinder numbers

    Here are some statistics on 10 of the top MTT players (greater than 180 players) for the last 30 days

    These numbers are per player for 30 days:
    - Average number of games played is 650
    - Average total cost is $20,000
    - Average total net earnings is $35,000
    - Average non winning streak is 35
    - Average ITM is 14.75%
    - Average number of final table is 2.5%
    - Average ROI is 145%

    So, what does all these numbers mean?

    - If you look at the average number of games played by these players, there is no doubt we can't even come close. This is what differentiates grinders, pro's from recreational players like us.
    - The average expense per month for these MTT's for those players can't even compare to most of us playing $0.10 or $1.10, nor do we come close to 1/100 of their earnings.
    - The average non winning streak is 35 games without a win, which for them is almost a full day. But for us mortals, if we play 10 games a week, that means we could be a whole month without a win.
    - The average ITM of 14.75% translated to recreational player of 10 games a week would mean that we would make the money once in 7 games. This could be minimum cash and not necessarily a final table. These players averaged 2.5% final table, so with our 10 games a week, we would make the final table once every 5 weeks
    - Their average return on investment is due to the high buy-ins, because, as you will see from the next statistics, the low buy-ins we play, we could say, that they are no better than us...LOL

    I categorized the buy-ins in 4 levels (average is by players in one month)

    $1.00 - $11.00
    Games played 150
    ROI -34%
    ITM 12.6%

    $12.00 - $44.00
    Games played 230
    ROI 24%
    ITM 12.5%

    $45.00 - $88.00
    Games played 160
    ROI 55%
    ITM 17.2%

    $89.00 - $530.00
    Games played 110
    ROI 236%
    ITM 17.6%

    We can't compare our numbers with the ones of grinders and pro's. They have a bigger bankroll, they play more games than we do. Having those opportunities, they can afford to play ATC or have a bigger range of cards. They can afford to take chances or gamble. I also notice from watching some of them play, if they are way ahead in 3-4 tournaments, they will open up their range by lots in the others. That's something we don't have the opportunity to do, as our next game is in a week.

    Also, when people complain about bad beats, remember, those players also get hit. The difference is in the numbers, if you were to play 650 games a month, you wouldn't see them as much.

  • #2
    Thanks for the Infoumbup:

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Sandtrap777 View Post
      We can't compare our numbers with the ones of grinders and pro's. They have a bigger bankroll, they play more games than we do. Having those opportunities, they can afford to play ATC or have a bigger range of cards. They can afford to take chances or gamble. I also notice from watching some of them play, if they are way ahead in 3-4 tournaments, they will open up their range by lots in the others. That's something we don't have the opportunity to do, as our next game is in a week.
      I don't understand the logic here. Could you elaborate on why you think this is an advantage.

      Comment


      • #4
        Heres mine still got 4 1st place finishes so it might go up a bit.

        $0.25 - $2.20
        Games played 328
        ROI 17%
        ITM 19%

        Year 2012 98.91% $428 8% 1,581 14% 8,132 of 749,027

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Darkman61 View Post
          I don't understand the logic here. Could you elaborate on why you think this is an advantage.
          Basically my statement as to do with them being under chip average.

          Don't know if you ever took the time to watch these players, but I did
          They have plenty of games going on at the same time. When a game becomes low stack or they fall below average stack, their range opens up and they play more hands compare to the ones that they are above average chips.

          The difference between them and us as to do with numbers. If I play the Storm, I want to make sure I get into the money as my next Storm is next week. For them it's no worry since they'll be playing 150 games by next week.

          As an example, one of them on Sunday was fishing for a straight and got it on the river, runner runner. (79o with no 7 or 9 on the board)
          PS. Not the only story I can tell

          Hope this answers your question

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by m.bisland View Post
            Heres mine still got 4 1st place finishes so it might go up a bit.

            $0.25 - $2.20
            Games played 328
            ROI 17%
            ITM 19%

            Year 2012 98.91% $428 8% 1,581 14% 8,132 of 749,027
            The research I did was on MTT's not SnG Mtt's
            If you want to compare, look at the MTT Tournaments (Greater than 500 players)

            Comment


            • #7
              Very impressive ROI.

              Thanks for the post

              Comment

              Working...
              X

              X Cookies Information

              We have placed cookies on your computer to improve your experience on our website. You can change your cookie settings at any time. Otherwise, we'll assume you're OK to continue.