PokerStars homepage
  • If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

25nl - River decision w/ blockers

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 25nl - River decision w/ blockers

    Stats VPIP: 21, PFR: 18, 3B: 9, AF: 2.5, Hands: 280 Pretty interesting hand vs a 25nl reg. Think calling flop is ok given he'll cbet with most of his range and we most likely have 2 clean over outs. Turn is standard. River brings a BD flush and he keeps betting. I don't think we can call profitably vs his triple barreling range. I think we should be jamming here? We block flushes and boats, and we shouldn't be bluffing here much.
    Last edited by birdayy; Thu Jan 30, 2014, 04:43 PM.

  • #2
    Honestly I don't think we need a bluff range in this spot. If we were to have a bluff range this hand might make sense to include if not for the fact that its a great bluff-catcher itself for the very reasons its blockers make a good bluff-shove in your book. A bluff-shove should have blockers and can't beat some air, so K9ss comes to mind.

    In any case, villain's don't triple barrel and fold here often enough for this to be profitable at 25nl in my estimation. Villain's don't go nuts on A high boards even in blind v blind.

    Do you think villain is bet/folding an ace here very often?

    If you didn't think calling river was profitable that certainly means it because you perceive villain's river betting range as strong. At 25nl we should be bluffing weakness, not strength. I think that's the bottom line. The reason we don't bluff strength is because villains don't hand read for better hands and if they do hand read for a better hand they will often call anyways because they are undisciplined.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by GarethC23 View Post
      Honestly I don't think we need a bluff range in this spot. If we were to have a bluff range this hand might make sense to include if not for the fact that its a great bluff-catcher itself for the very reasons its blockers make a good bluff-shove in your book.
      But you said...

      Originally posted by GarethC23 View Post
      Villain's don't go nuts on A high boards even in blind v blind.
      Originally posted by GarethC23 View Post
      Do you think villain is bet/folding an ace here very often?
      A thinking player should recognise that a naked Ax is towards the bottom of his value range on this river. He can have small flushes which are ahead of Ax that should also fold to this shove.

      Obviously my aim is to move up to bigger and tougher games.

      May I ask what this line would be like at 100nl vs a player like you Gareth?
      Last edited by birdayy; Thu Jan 30, 2014, 06:06 PM.

      Comment


      • #4
        Most of the players at 100nl, including regulars, are losing to the rake (or the field), it is worth noting. Among the regs I would also say that very few play "like me."

        In any case, I would fold often to your river shove with AX.

        No reason to bluff strength here though. Bluffing strength seldom works in tougher games at higher stakes. As per my first reply, counting on villains to both hand read and to ave the discipline to follow through on that hand reading when they have an absolutely strong hand in a spot like blind v blind will wind you up in trouble more often than it will get you out of a bind.

        That's just my opinion on it.

        Comment


        • #5
          Thanks G.

          Appreciate your thoughts and the fact you're still around after becoming a high stakes donkament crusher.

          Comment

          Working...
          X

          X Cookies Information

          We have placed cookies on your computer to improve your experience on our website. You can change your cookie settings at any time. Otherwise, we'll assume you're OK to continue.