PokerStars homepage
  • If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

0.01/0.02 NLHE Zoom - Good fold with QQ but should I have folded preflop?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 0.01/0.02 NLHE Zoom - Good fold with QQ but should I have folded preflop?

    http://www.boomplayer.com/en/poker-h...774_70D10E1415

    I maybe should have raised more initially after 1 limper, but still got a MASSIVE reraise and one caller. Is there logic to folding QQ here, or should I see a flop to try and spike another Q?

  • #2
    You dont have the odds to set-mine which means, IMO, that if you are going to fold on a safe looking flop then you either get it in or fold here.

    Personally, I would fold, unless there was some indication that one of the two that went to showdown are spewy.

    The 3bet squeeze is strong. The JJ hand should have folded too and got lucky.

    I'd watch your raise size though 6c over a limper isnt big enough for me. Should be 8-10c.

    Comment


    • #3
      Your initial raise is too small. Add at least 1bb to your open to try and isolated the limper. The 3-bet squeeze is very concerning, as 2NL villains don't squeeze light very often. His range is pretty much QQ+/AK. With QQ on a regular 6-max table I usually commit to stacking off pre against anyone but an ubernit, as you can 4-bet and get called or shoved on by worse. On Zoom, however, villains are much nittier in general, so you should give them more credit.
      In this spot, I think you're behind too often to 4-bet (you'll get valueowned by KK+, and 4-betting and then folding to a shove is basically spew, as it's akin to "raising for info"), so that only leaves folding or calling as reasonable options.
      The cold call by the big blind looks like QQ-99 hoping to go set-mining, even though he's too short to do so, but the dead money he adds to the pot makes this a closer decision for you.
      If you call, it's pretty much to go set-mining, as an overpair is no good if villain has KK+. So let's do the math and see if it's profitable. Assuming the 3-bettor is the guy that will pay you off if you hit a set vs his overpair, you stand to win the rest of his stack ($1.61) plus the money already in the middle (70c) and the price of calling is 22c. Your implied odds are therefore (161+70):22 = 231:22 = 10.5:1
      When set-mining I want implied odds of 15:1 or better, so I think that makes this a fold pre. You won't hit a set and stack the PFR often enough to make back the cost of calling his 3-bet.

      Hope this helps!

      Cheers,
      Arty
      Bracelet Winner

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by ArtySmokesPS View Post
        So let's do the math and see if it's profitable. Assuming the 3-bettor is the guy that will pay you off if you hit a set vs his overpair, you stand to win the rest of his stack ($1.61) plus the money already in the middle (70c) and the price of calling is 22c. Your implied odds are therefore (161+70):22 = 231:22 = 10.5:1
        When set-mining I want implied odds of 15:1 or better, so I think that makes this a fold pre. You won't hit a set and stack the PFR often enough to make back the cost of calling his 3-bet.
        This part literally made me understand implied odds better than I ever have before! I always just kind of assumed I knew the general idea of implied odds, but nothing really specific.

        Nice one guys!

        Comment


        • #5
          Hey Rob, Interesting spot... Personally, I would not fold QQ (IP) p/f to a 3bet [SB] + 1 caller [BB] at 2NL Zoom (6 max) & I think flatting in this spot is fine & not purely for set mining purposes? Even if we assume SB is 3betting with QQ+ AKs AKo & BB is calling with TT+ AJs+ AQo+ [... although in reality I've seen Villains 3 bet / squeeze with much wider ranges from Blinds] we still have decent equity against their ranges & OTF are only losing to AA, KK [... as I don't see either with 33; 44; 66] & flipping Vs . That said, given 'post-flop' action it is a shove / fold decision... SB makes a healthy cbet & BB calls, I think your fold is decent, because we're likely up against AA, KK, too often to stack off here... Nice fold! GL at the tables. BR Tony [Prodigy237] umbup: P.S. As others have already mentioned... I would raise more Vs initial limper.
          Last edited by Prodigy237; Mon Oct 21, 2013, 03:16 PM. Reason: Added

          Comment

          Working...
          X

          X Cookies Information

          We have placed cookies on your computer to improve your experience on our website. You can change your cookie settings at any time. Otherwise, we'll assume you're OK to continue.