PokerStars homepage
  • If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

NL5FR 710s sb v UTG limp

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • NL5FR 710s sb v UTG limp

    hi

    small blind question.!

    I usually always raise and isolate limpers but here im OOP and my hand isnt that great, so can u complete SB here or if im gonna play it shall i raise i wanted to see a flop against the 2 fish tbh. seems a kindov marginal question but iv notised i do this a few times in every session. could be a big leak not sure.

    http://www.boomplayer.com/en/poker-h...523_3B0BA2EA23

  • #2
    If he is total fish, then he doesn’t fold to CB, so raise would be bad, if he folds to CB then raising is ok (because your hand is very bad). In general, you want bet fish with made value.

    However, he limped UTG, so I would give him a quite good hand without knowing more.

    I think u should choose between folding or calling.
    Last edited by braveslice; Tue Aug 13, 2013, 02:57 AM.

    Comment


    • #3
      Hi UrGetinTaxed

      braveslice gave a nice logic about deciding on which line to take. However, I think the decision should be either raise or fold. I would not complete the SB when I am not even closing the action.
      Villain started the hand with less than 50bbs so our implied odds go way down and our hand will unlikely win if we flop TP. So I elect to fold.

      Comment


      • #4
        geoVARTA, I know one should fold, but don't tell me you would not call in this position time to time? What would be the game plan be after raising? No CB after missing? I don't pretend to know better, just trying to learn.

        What I'm wondering is that why there is more value in raising and not calling with bad but potential hand against 'weak'. We know that if he raises he has really good hand.
        Last edited by braveslice; Tue Aug 13, 2013, 08:17 PM.

        Comment


        • #5
          i kindov agree with what braveslice is saying there, i dont always play the sb this way but somtimes i feel its ok

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by braveslice View Post
            geoVARTA, I know one should fold, but don't tell me you would not call in this position time to time? What would be the game plan be after raising? No CB after missing? I don't pretend to know better, just trying to learn.

            What I'm wondering is that why there is more value in raising and not calling with bad but potential hand against 'weak'. We know that if he raises he has really good hand.
            Hi braveslice let me try to reply to your questions by putting out another question for you to answer What's your reason for calling? and what's ur plan when you see a flop?

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by geoVARTA View Post
              Hi braveslice let me try to reply to your questions by putting out another question for you to answer What's your reason for calling? and what's ur plan when you see a flop?
              Finally a statement from geo that I totally agree with...lol
              A plan and a reason a must, most will do it out of curiosity

              If it was me, I also call. I'm in profit, 2 gap connectors for straight or flush, very low cost to do so. If I flop nothing I fold.
              Flop gives me mid pair, that's not strong enough, so I'll check and depending on the size of the bet (if any), I'll fold if more than 50% of pot. I won't be going very far as T7 is not a good hand.
              If the villain would of done a normal raise, it was an automatic fold for me

              GL

              Comment


              • #8
                If the villain would of done a normal raise, it was an automatic fold for me

                GL


                ..ownership is 9/10th of the law.


                nic

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Sandtrap777 View Post
                  Finally a statement from geo that I totally agree with...lol
                  A plan and a reason a must, most will do it out of curiosity

                  If it was me, I also call. I'm in profit, 2 gap connectors for straight or flush, very low cost to do so. If I flop nothing I fold.
                  Flop gives me mid pair, that's not strong enough, so I'll check and depending on the size of the bet (if any), I'll fold if more than 50% of pot. I won't be going very far as T7 is not a good hand.
                  If the villain would of done a normal raise, it was an automatic fold for me

                  GL
                  Are we condescending again Sandtrap?

                  I'm not sure what you mean by "I'm in profit". Sure our hand looks pretty but I think the odds for us to flop big is pretty low. Although we are getting 4:1 I think if we simulate this hand over a large sample we might be losing more money than just giving up the SB because we either will be x/folding flop 70% of the time or losing/winning a medium pot 30% of the time. I'll try to put some math for it, but might be a hastle. Will try either ways... Thanks for ur insight Sandtrap.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    What I mean by in profit, he started with a $5 stack and he's now at $6.52, therefore $0.05 extra wont hurt. If my stack was below $4.50, then I would fold.
                    We all wish to flop big, but that's not the point.

                    1) It's a cheap call to see the flop for a flush, straight, straight flush, a set or even top pair
                    2) It's not about the numbers as numbers shouldn't be the only factor that should dictate your play.
                    3) You need to fold if you don't catch or there's a greater than normal bet, therefore max loss is an extra $0.05. A raise can cost you lots more.

                    Different view than just the numbers view
                    http://www.pokerschoolonline.com/blo...right#comments

                    condescending again?? not at all

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Sometimes maybe strong-looking flops aren't so strong? Kind of like how with sets a A72r flop vs AK is a gazillion times better than a 9xTsJs vs QsKs?

                      Like maybe a strong flop for 7hTh would have been a board like 8h9xAh (with a 6c turn) versus AK, rather than like a 8hJhTc vs J9 with a limper who wanted to play for stacks on the flop? :/


                      I've just started playing suited connectors more at 10nl and have found myself in a couple of similar situations, where we wound up playing for stacks and were basically just flipping. And I'm not so crazy about flips because it makes the all-in EV graph go wild, which tilts me pretty bad

                      Guess I'm still trying to figure out how to play suited connectors, so I thought this was an interesting 'outside the box' scenario to ponder, with an interesting discussion


                      Time for sleep, but I'm not very sleepy ... hope my comment doesn't sound like I should have gone to bed an hour ago to stop the rambling

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Sandtrap777 View Post
                        What I mean by in profit, he started with a $5 stack and he's now at $6.52, therefore $0.05 extra wont hurt. If my stack was below $4.50, then I would fold.
                        We all wish to flop big, but that's not the point.

                        1) It's a cheap call to see the flop for a flush, straight, straight flush, a set or even top pair
                        2) It's not about the numbers as numbers shouldn't be the only factor that should dictate your play.
                        3) You need to fold if you don't catch or there's a greater than normal bet, therefore max loss is an extra $0.05. A raise can cost you lots more.

                        Different view than just the numbers view
                        http://www.pokerschoolonline.com/blo...right#comments

                        condescending again?? not at all
                        1) Here are some interesting facts:
                        . We hit TP (7 or T) 14% of the time
                        . We hit an OESD roughly 1% of the time
                        . We have a GS roughly 2% of the time
                        . We have a FD 5% of the time
                        (Assuming I did the math right)

                        2) Yes numbers should not be the ONLY factor, BUT they should be the primary factor as that's what dictates what is the most EV action to take

                        3) You miss a flop 70% of the time; When we raise we have initiative and can capitalize on that fact by putting a cbet which will "theoretically" speaking get 70% folds

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Right so I tried doing a tree diagram to find out if completing the SB is a +EV play, but the branches keep going and going and tbh I think we might be giving this more time than it deserves

                          The point is, from experience and reading, I find that to playing SCs or One gappers profitably you would need initiative or position or even better both! That is because we seldom hit a flop strongly ~ 10% and the rest we have some TP that is super vulnerable. Which means we need to be taking semi-bluffing or bluffing lines more often to win the pot without showdown and to be able to take such lines we would need to have initiative and position to control the pot. And since villain has <100bbs then we cannot capitalize on implied odds.

                          I would consider isolating if villain had 100bbs (for implied odds) and I was OTB, but my preference would be to just fold the SB because it might get sticky and I will be in a tough spot OOP without initiative when we might even be drawing to the dummy end on 50% of the occasions. There are just soooo many more profitable spots to be in that it really doesn't matter to forfeit 0.5bbs with such a marginal hand.
                          Last edited by geoVARTA; Wed Aug 14, 2013, 12:56 PM.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Interesting thread and discussion guys umbup:

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Little story

                              In a live cash play, a very well known respected PSO member called my normal raise (3x) with Q5s. He had a bigger stack, knew me, wasn't using any HUD....LOL, no calculator, no poker stove. It was a cheap call and I would of done the same.

                              Result, I had JJ and flopped a J, but he flopped a flush...lol and I lost.

                              Just saying that it's not all about numbers, it's about the cost, luck, stack size and how much you've drank.....LOL

                              When you're hoping for luck, it needs to be at a very low cost and it shouldn't hurt your stack or profit, and you need to be in profit and be willing to fold at any time. In this case, (T7s), it's not about the numbers, since numbers are not in your favor, it's about the cost and the cost is right.

                              It's like stealing the BB when on the button with nothing, to me that's more expensive than this example

                              That's how I would of played it
                              Last edited by Sandtrap777; Wed Aug 14, 2013, 08:31 PM.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X

                              X Cookies Information

                              We have placed cookies on your computer to improve your experience on our website. You can change your cookie settings at any time. Otherwise, we'll assume you're OK to continue.