PokerStars homepage
  • If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

please reply

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • please reply

    I know I made the correct play here, but does anyone advocate set mining with such a low pair under the gun ? PokerStars Game #59032850472: Tournament #368288568, Freeroll Hold'em No Limit - Level VIII (150/300) - 2011/03/11 14:26:38 ET Table '368288568 104' 9-max Seat #6 is the button Seat 1: Bill Curran (4024 in chips) Seat 3: krunovg (3958 in chips) Seat 4: samurye (930 in chips) Seat 5: kralovpd (9235 in chips) Seat 6: Ernie1949 (7875 in chips) Seat 7: sickcall368 (2256 in chips) is sitting out Seat 8: nepstar2000 (1326 in chips) Seat 9: gladass513 (2932 in chips) Bill Curran: posts the ante 25 krunovg: posts the ante 25 samurye: posts the ante 25 kralovpd: posts the ante 25 Ernie1949: posts the ante 25 sickcall368: posts the ante 25 nepstar2000: posts the ante 25 gladass513: posts the ante 25 sickcall368: posts small blind 150 nepstar2000: posts big blind 300 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to Bill Curran [3d 3c] gladass513: calls 300 Bill Curran: folds krunovg: raises 600 to 900 samurye: folds kralovpd: folds Ernie1949: folds sickcall368: folds nepstar2000: raises 401 to 1301 and is all-in gladass513: calls 1001 krunovg: calls 401 *** FLOP *** [2h Qd 3s] gladass513: bets 1606 and is all-in krunovg: calls 1606 *** TURN *** [2h Qd 3s] [3h] *** RIVER *** [2h Qd 3s 3h] [Ks] Spadedust is connected *** SHOW DOWN *** gladass513: shows [Kc Qs] (two pair, Kings and Queens) krunovg: shows [7c 7h] (two pair, Sevens and Threes) gladass513 collected 3212 from side pot nepstar2000: shows [Jd Ah] (a pair of Threes) gladass513 collected 4253 from main pot nepstar2000 finished the tournament in 369th place *** SUMMARY *** Total pot 7465 Main pot 4253. Side pot 3212. | Rake 0 Board [2h Qd 3s 3h Ks] Seat 1: Bill Curran folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 3: krunovg showed [7c 7h] and lost with two pair, Sevens and Threes Seat 4: samurye folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 5: kralovpd folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 6: Ernie1949 (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 7: sickcall368 (small blind) folded before Flop Seat 8: nepstar2000 (big blind) showed [Jd Ah] and lost with a pair of Threes Seat 9: gladass513 showed [Kc Qs] and won (7465) with two pair, Kings and Queens umbup:
    3 Time Bracelet Winner



  • #2
    ??

    if i gonna play em- i gonna raise em---if im the one to open--

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by monkeyskunk4 View Post
      if i gonna play em- i gonna raise em---if im the one to open--
      I agree with MONK here. I would hide my hand better with a raise UTG+1. I too will setmine with pairs this small. I like how it was played Bill. However, I would raise to open. Maybe knock it down without flop even. 2.5 or 3 and you can escape with a shove OTT.

      JT
      Last edited by JT_Sooooted; Fri Mar 11, 2011, 10:10 PM.

      Comment


      • #4
        Calling would be bad on a 13 bb stack. I would actually prefer a shove over the weak limper on these stacks.... You have good leverage to fold them out, and it looks stronger since you're shoving from EP over an UTG limper. And if you get called, you'll be playing a lot of flips which is fine on a 13 bb stack.

        Fold is ok but if you think you have a reasonable shot at getting everyone out behind you and have FE on the weak limper, then shoving would be far superior.
        Head Live Trainer
        Check out my Videos

        4 Time Bracelet Winner



        Comment


        • #5
          Thanks for your responses guys. Gladass played either high suited connectors or Two Paint with a limp, a small raise was usually a medium pair or AK AQ a strong raise would have been either a Bluff or a monster, from what I had seen. I figured he had JQ or better and he had been very fortunate with his choices earlier. However, when ever he bet light krunovg always raised him sometimes with air. So when he limped in, I expected a raise somewhere along the way, krunovg, kralovpd, and nepstar had all raised with rubbish and with quality hands in the same manner for both types. At least one of these three plus gladass had been involved in every hand at this table, I don't think even an all in would have made all of them fold, I would expect one or even two of them to come along. OK, in this case I would have won, but on the whole I would expect 33 to lose most of the time to two other players being in the hand. I don't know what the numbers are, but I would hazard a guess that they are not high for pocket threes to win with two or three other players in the hand. ??? Once again Guys, thanks umbup:
          3 Time Bracelet Winner


          Comment

          Working...
          X

          X Cookies Information

          We have placed cookies on your computer to improve your experience on our website. You can change your cookie settings at any time. Otherwise, we'll assume you're OK to continue.