PokerStars homepage
  • If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

not happy :(

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • not happy :(

    i dont feel that pokerstars is playing fair none of the stuff i have been reading through in the courses seem to work or apply to the games of open skill or 100:k deposit game. does any one else feel the same????

  • #2
    maybe you missed the bet sizing lessons......... Welcome, and GLumbup: Weasel

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by jperrie-uk View Post
      apply to the games of open skill or 100:k deposit game.
      Hi jperrie-uk, Remember that the Open Leagues and the Depositor games are large field MTT's and Freerolls As a result, not all of the players in these tournaments might be treating them as seriously as you. Also, many might be beginners who have not yet developed their game, and as a result they make bad bets and bad decisions. These games are played by other players and not by PokerStars, who would have no say in the decision making process of the players at the table. Over time, the players that work hard at their game become better players for it. Raiser umbup:
      Last edited by royalraise85; Sun Oct 07, 2012, 05:47 PM.

      Comment


      • #4
        The Open Skill League is a specialised event which bears no resemblance to "REAL" poker.

        98% of the players in this couldn't care less because it's a "freeroll" and they are gambling for the pennies at the end of each tourney.

        The main aim of OSL is to teach you patience and hand selection, and thus the real prizes are at month end when you are rewarded for consistently good results.

        I have sent you a pm with more details on how to play OSL to win money at month end.

        Comment


        • #5
          I made a deposit last month just so I could play those depositor freerolls, and didn't cash *once*.

          Not only that, but by flaming out in such fantastic fashion, it wound up eroding my confidence so badly when it comes to tourneys that I don't even feel capable of making a cash any more.

          Like I'm terrified to put money down, even so much as a quarter or 10FPPs, to even try.

          It really did a number on my self-esteem.


          I think I'm gonna have to watch like at least a 10 Chewme videos before I'll feel up to even considering giving one a go again.

          And my track record in tourneys isn't even that bad.


          I'm trying to think of a better place for you to maybe get better experience at trying to put the lessons you've been learning into practice ... hmmm ... maybe some of the home games or something?

          Comment


          • #6
            feelings

            I would say if you feel that way dont go and play cash and one thing i seen hear at PSO is lots of ways to control your feelings dont let them show at a table for a start the 100k i find is relly good value for money?well worth the add on when you make it that far once you do it the 1st time it should not be that hard the next time.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by DaiDark View Post
              I would say if you feel that way dont go and play cash and one thing i seen hear at PSO is lots of ways to control your feelings dont let them show at a table for a start the 100k i find is relly good value for money?well worth the add on when you make it that far once you do it the 1st time it should not be that hard the next time.
              Were you trying to give me advice here? Because all the o/p seems to be playing are freerolls. Like were you saying that because you've cashed at depositor freerolls, anybody who hasn't must really be bad or something and therefore shouldn't be playing "cash games"? Did you mean cash games, or tourneys with a cash buy-in? I don't know what your experience was at the depositor freerolls was, but with the short starting stacks, and turbo speed, I found it virtually impossible to get head-to-head against just one person. Which meant I rarely had more than 33% equity when all-in (full-ring, more people). Ergo, I don't see how you're arriving at the conclusion that one needs to be able to cash in a depositor freeroll to be able to be profitable at cash games. Especially in light of the fact that I didn't cash in a depositor freeroll, and I AM profitable at cash games, and have been consistently for well over a hundred thousand hands, with a solid win-rate. I guess you must have meant tourneys with cash buy-ins ... like that if a person can't cash in a depositor freeroll, they shouldn't be playing tourneys with a cash buy-in? Well to that I'd say that tourneys come with a lot of different structures - so the structure of the depositor freeroll, which is a lot more like a 2-times-turbo rebuy than a regular speed 6-max, might be something for somebody to avoid who's running bad. But getting your stack in with AKo in a multi-way pot isn't necessarily something that's going to happen a lot in the Big $2.20. So I don't think you can necessarily conclude that somebody who didn't win at least 1 in 3 times as a 33% favorite ought not to pay buy-ins until they can. And you can't necessarily conclude that if you've cashed in a depositor freeroll, that you've got all the skills you need to routinely do well in the big $2.20. I mean like it might, but it might not. Like here's a hand where I bubbled - some people might see min-cashes as more important that trying to maximize equity, so I KNOW some people will view my choice to play this hand close to the bubble as a sign of a 'bad player', and that a 'good player' would have folded - and probably you're one of those people. But I guess ultimately I've just chosen to always try to maximize EV on the belief that the money will follow. So that's like an ideological difference I guess ... but you can call me a 'bad player' if you want for not going for that $0.33 or whatever ... Probably you weren't thinking much of that at all, were you ... or at least not consciously?
              Last edited by TrustySam; Tue Oct 09, 2012, 11:39 PM.

              Comment


              • #8
                @Sam - don't you just hate it when they call your all in with junk and catch on the river?? Well played, I would have done exactly the same thing. umbup:umbup:
                Bracelet Winner


                Comment


                • #9
                  Hey, thx Joy!!! umbup: I was just thinking of you the other day, because I'm doing that 6-max challenge and one of the prizes for the winning team (if we wind up winning) is a chance to play a $5.50 MTT with $100 added ... and I was wondering to myself whether it'd be possible to have somebody play for me, like you (and then we'd split the prize) umbup:umbup: Except that I suck at tourneys so I'm sure the team would insist I play instead LOL!!! Oh well ... hey nice to see u still dropping in - hope the tables are goin' great for ya Joy!!! umbup:umbup:umbup:

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Way I see it:
                    I'm one of those who min-cashes a lot and seldom makes FT in big-number tourneys.

                    See my 'scope graphs, they really tell the story. I have two because I got kicked out of Pokerstas due to nationalization, cashed out because of terrorism, and after a while - mainly due to the September freerolls) started min-playing again on Poquerstars, which you would "love" as much as I do.

                    The funny thing is, although I'm not a "losing" player - see graphs- I think of myself as a "bad" player precisely because I can't quite do just that, risk it all near the bubble, near FT, etc.

                    So you're probably the "good" player in this context, and although you have to put up with higher variance than us nitties, if and when the results come, they'll certainly be results worth having played for.

                    That said, I got nationalized just as I was getting a bankroll I could play with, had to start from zero again, in an environment it's costing me a bit to adapt to, I'm still gaining experience without losing, I may graduate eventually
                    Last edited by Don B. Cilly; Thu Oct 11, 2012, 08:22 PM.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Don B. Cilly View Post
                      The funny thing is, although I'm not a "losing" player - see graphs- I think of myself as a "bad" player precisely because I can't quite do just that, risk it all near the bubble, near FT, etc. So you're probably the "good" player in this context, and although you have to put up with higher variance than us nitties, if and when the results come, they'll certainly be results worth having played for.
                      I kinda take tourney results with a grain of salt, because so many of us play so few of them, that it seems like there maybe isn't a large enough sample size? And then, just knowing my own graphs - they don't always tell the whole story of how I wound up making x number of dollars. My biggest Sunday Storm cash, at least 1/3 of my cash I made by blinding out because I lost my fold equity before I could push-fold - and then it got so lucrative to just sit, that that's what I did ... lol! On the other hand though, more than 1/2 of the cash for sure was directly a result of watching Chewme videos and playing the way he taught - like without learning the stuff I did about big-stack play on the bubble, I'd have never made as much as I did. Probably if I hadn't lost my fold equity I might have tried to stay more textbook, and maybe next time I will. But, like ... I don't really like to think in terms of black and white, and 'right' and 'wrong', and 'good' and 'bad' ... sometimes different things can be best for different people and different situations and different times, eh? Like maybe it's up to each person to decide what's right and best for them and their situation and what they hope to get out of things? umbup: That kind of sucks that all the European countries are sectioning off like that ... I would have thought that EU countries would be more open or something? On the other hand, you get to live in Spain ... muy bueno My parents are going to Barcelona for vacation in a couple of weeks ... they're super excited!

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Agree with Joy
                        Originally posted by joy7108 View Post
                        @Sam - don't you just hate it when they call your all in with junk and catch on the river?? Well played, I would have done exactly the same thing. umbup:umbup:
                        Yeah, with 10 BB, I think it's an easy shove. You are a 68 to 31% favorite in that situation (granted you don't know your opponents cards when you shove) And I don't agree with folding to min-cash. If you had A-A, the result would have been the same, and I know you wouldn't have folded A-A to min-cash, right?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          **moved to a more appropriate forum**

                          Quintuple Bracelet Winner

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by TrustySam View Post
                            Like here's a hand where I bubbled - some people might see min-cashes as more important that trying to maximize equity, so I KNOW some people will view my choice to play this hand close to the bubble as a sign of a 'bad player', and that a 'good player' would have folded - and probably you're one of those people. But I guess ultimately I've just chosen to always try to maximize EV on the belief that the money will follow. So that's like an ideological difference I guess ... but you can call me a 'bad player' if you want for not going for that $0.33 or whatever ...
                            Decent shove imho, unless you really want to min-cash (the nice won $200+ sattelite and couldn't unregister example ). Regarding the freerolls, I played some and even cashed some, I even got a big stack in one, then my connection failed and I blinded out at 170 something for $1 . But I wouldn't make another deposit just to be able to play these. The structure is somewhat sucky and you have to gamble pretty extremely at the start to make it in the money, especially if you don't rebuy.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by khrndz1737 View Post
                              Yeah, with 10 BB, I think it's an easy shove. You are a 68 to 31% favorite in that situation (granted you don't know your opponents cards when you shove) And I don't agree with folding to min-cash. If you had A-A, the result would have been the same, and I know you wouldn't have folded A-A to min-cash, right?
                              Hey, thx - that helps a lot to think of it that way Yeah, definitely never folding AA ... cool, that helps a lot!! umbup:

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X

                              X Cookies Information

                              We have placed cookies on your computer to improve your experience on our website. You can change your cookie settings at any time. Otherwise, we'll assume you're OK to continue.