PokerStars homepage
  • If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

OPR v PLAYERSCOPE.COM

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • OPR v PLAYERSCOPE.COM

    So this is my player scope link,

    http://playerscope.com/briany84/poke...54&pnid=1&tt=8

    And this is my OPR link,

    http://www.officialpokerrankings.com...?t=2&rc=303440

    WITH RE BUY ADD ON ESTIMATE TURNED OFF......

    This is my OPR link with REBUY ADD ONN ESTIMATE TURNED ON...

    http://www.officialpokerrankings.com...C.html?t=2&rc=

    SO WHATS THE DEAL, WHICH ONE DO WE GO BY??

  • #2
    lol, stat junkie HEAVEN....

    Comment


    • #3
      I think the most accurate database would be a hand tracker. The only site I've seen record accurate numbers for me is Sharkscope. Just about every site doesn't track something, and that's the site that misses the least for me. Could be different from person to person, though.

      Comment


      • #4
        Hey thanks for the new site to check out stats. I use pokerpro labs as my main spot to check stats because I was given unlimited searches because I was trying out their HUD! I also like sharkscope but it doesn't make sense for me to pay them a fee for the searches I can get for free on the one i use.
        I also like the way I can search all games played by a player but the one thing i find annoying is they don't list a tourney id # for reference which sharkscope does.
        I've done some quick checking on this new site and it appears to post a similar style to pokerpro labs but it doesn't allow a stacking of players for side by side reference which doesn't appeal.
        My main reason for using this is of course for stats verification for my challenge and the stacking is important.

        I also agree that every site I have seen seems to miss data. I don't like OPR at all because it is very misleading data as it only tracks games with players over 36 in the field and alot of people play less than those size sng's. It is also very hard to pick out the data and it isn't detailed enough.

        Thanks for this new site i will keep looking at it.

        Comment


        • #5
          Which tracking site do you tend to use Chris?

          Comment

          Working...
          X

          X Cookies Information

          We have placed cookies on your computer to improve your experience on our website. You can change your cookie settings at any time. Otherwise, we'll assume you're OK to continue.