PokerStars homepage
  • If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.


No announcement yet.

Stakes and play

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Stakes and play

    Recently I have developed a theory [which has some credibility] the theory being that I do better in .10/.25 than I do in .01/.02 I seem to get better results after the few sessions I have played at the higher level. After dropping down to the micro stakes [due to some bankroll issues] my results have got worse, I am ploughing money into my account week after week only to see it diminish to nothing. The more accomplished and educated I have become as a player the worse my results have become. Having dropped down to the lowest stakes to follow bankroll management protocol I find myself getting felted time after time. What are peoples thoughts, is there some weight to my theory?
    could it be less skilled players are reluctant to play at higher levels and I have more variance to contend with?
    should I be able to do well at any level and there is a leak in my game?
    Is a level of play suited to a particular stake [skill balanced]?
    Please advise

X Cookies Information

We have placed cookies on your computer to improve your experience on our website. You can change your cookie settings at any time. Otherwise, we'll assume you're OK to continue.